Docs
You are looking at preliminary documentation for a future release. Not what you want? See the current release documentation.
Elasticsearch Reference [master] » Mapping » Mapping parameters » fielddata
« enabled format »

fielddataedit

Most fields are indexed by default, which makes them searchable. Sorting, aggregations, and accessing field values in scripts, however, requires a different access pattern from search.

Search needs to answer the question "Which documents contain this term?", while sorting and aggregations need to answer a different question: "What is the value of this field for this document?".

Most fields can use index-time, on-disk doc_values for this data access pattern, but text fields do not support doc_values.

Instead, text fields use a query-time in-memory data structure called fielddata. This data structure is built on demand the first time that a field is used for aggregations, sorting, or in a script. It is built by reading the entire inverted index for each segment from disk, inverting the term ↔︎ document relationship, and storing the result in memory, in the JVM heap.

Fielddata is disabled on text fields by defaultedit

Fielddata can consume a lot of heap space, especially when loading high cardinality text fields. Once fielddata has been loaded into the heap, it remains there for the lifetime of the segment. Also, loading fielddata is an expensive process which can cause users to experience latency hits. This is why fielddata is disabled by default.

If you try to sort, aggregate, or access values from a script on a text field, you will see this exception:

Fielddata is disabled on text fields by default.  Set `fielddata=true` on
[`your_field_name`] in order to load  fielddata in memory by uninverting the
inverted index. Note that this can however use significant memory.

Before enabling fielddataedit

Before you enable fielddata, consider why you are using a text field for aggregations, sorting, or in a script. It usually doesn’t make sense to do so.

A text field is analyzed before indexing so that a value like New York can be found by searching for new or for york. A terms aggregation on this field will return a new bucket and a york bucket, when you probably want a single bucket called New York.

Instead, you should have a text field for full text searches, and an unanalyzed keyword field with doc_values enabled for aggregations, as follows:

response = client.indices.create(
  index: 'my-index-000001',
  body: {
    mappings: {
      properties: {
        my_field: {
          type: 'text',
          fields: {
            keyword: {
              type: 'keyword'
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
)
puts response
res, err := es.Indices.Create(
	"my-index-000001",
	es.Indices.Create.WithBody(strings.NewReader(`{
	  "mappings": {
	    "properties": {
	      "my_field": {
	        "type": "text",
	        "fields": {
	          "keyword": {
	            "type": "keyword"
	          }
	        }
	      }
	    }
	  }
	}`)),
)
fmt.Println(res, err)
PUT my-index-000001
{
  "mappings": {
    "properties": {
      "my_field": { 
        "type": "text",
        "fields": {
          "keyword": { 
            "type": "keyword"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Use the my_field field for searches.

Use the my_field.keyword field for aggregations, sorting, or in scripts.

Enabling fielddata on text fieldsedit

You can enable fielddata on an existing text field using the PUT mapping API as follows:

response = client.indices.put_mapping(
  index: 'my-index-000001',
  body: {
    properties: {
      my_field: {
        type: 'text',
        fielddata: true
      }
    }
  }
)
puts response
res, err := es.Indices.PutMapping(
	[]string{"my-index-000001"},
	strings.NewReader(`{
	  "properties": {
	    "my_field": {
	      "type": "text",
	      "fielddata": true
	    }
	  }
	}`),
)
fmt.Println(res, err)
PUT my-index-000001/_mapping
{
  "properties": {
    "my_field": { 
      "type":     "text",
      "fielddata": true
    }
  }
}

The mapping that you specify for my_field should consist of the existing mapping for that field, plus the fielddata parameter.

fielddata_frequency_filteredit

Fielddata filtering can be used to reduce the number of terms loaded into memory, and thus reduce memory usage. Terms can be filtered by frequency:

The frequency filter allows you to only load terms whose document frequency falls between a min and max value, which can be expressed an absolute number (when the number is bigger than 1.0) or as a percentage (eg 0.01 is 1% and 1.0 is 100%). Frequency is calculated per segment. Percentages are based on the number of docs which have a value for the field, as opposed to all docs in the segment.

Small segments can be excluded completely by specifying the minimum number of docs that the segment should contain with min_segment_size:

response = client.indices.create(
  index: 'my-index-000001',
  body: {
    mappings: {
      properties: {
        tag: {
          type: 'text',
          fielddata: true,
          fielddata_frequency_filter: {
            min: 0.001,
            max: 0.1,
            min_segment_size: 500
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
)
puts response
res, err := es.Indices.Create(
	"my-index-000001",
	es.Indices.Create.WithBody(strings.NewReader(`{
	  "mappings": {
	    "properties": {
	      "tag": {
	        "type": "text",
	        "fielddata": true,
	        "fielddata_frequency_filter": {
	          "min": 0.001,
	          "max": 0.1,
	          "min_segment_size": 500
	        }
	      }
	    }
	  }
	}`)),
)
fmt.Println(res, err)
PUT my-index-000001
{
  "mappings": {
    "properties": {
      "tag": {
        "type": "text",
        "fielddata": true,
        "fielddata_frequency_filter": {
          "min": 0.001,
          "max": 0.1,
          "min_segment_size": 500
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
« enabled format »