Fortgeschrittene RAG-Techniken Teil 2: Abfragen und Testen
Diskussion und Umsetzung von Techniken zur Steigerung der RAG-Leistung. Teil 2 von 2, mit Schwerpunkt auf Abfragen und Tests einer erweiterten RAG-Pipeline.
Der gesamte Code ist im Searchlabs-Repository im Branch advanced-rag-techniques zu finden.
Willkommen zu Teil 2 unseres Artikels über fortgeschrittene RAG-Techniken! Im ersten Teil dieser Serie haben wir die Datenverarbeitungskomponenten der erweiterten RAG-Pipeline eingerichtet, besprochen und implementiert:
Die vom Autor verwendete RAG-Pipeline.
In diesem Teil werden wir mit dem Abfragen und Testen unserer Implementierung fortfahren. Kommen wir gleich zur Sache!
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Suchen und Abrufen, Generieren von Antworten
Beginnen wir mit unserer ersten Frage, idealerweise einer Information, die hauptsächlich im Jahresbericht zu finden ist. Wie wäre es mit:
Who audits Elastic?"Nun wenden wir einige unserer Techniken an, um die Abfrage zu verbessern.
Anreicherung von Suchanfragen mit Synonymen
Zunächst sollten wir die Vielfalt der Abfrageformulierungen erhöhen und sie in eine Form bringen, die sich leicht in eine Elasticsearch-Abfrage verarbeiten lässt. Wir werden GPT-4o zur Hilfe nehmen, um die Abfrage in eine Liste von OR-Klauseln umzuwandeln. Schreiben wir diese Aufgabenstellung auf:
ELASTIC_SEARCH_QUERY_GENERATOR_PROMPT = '''
You are an AI assistant specialized in generating Elasticsearch query strings. Your task is to create the most effective query string for the given user question. This query string will be used to search for relevant documents in an Elasticsearch index.
Guidelines:
1. Analyze the user's question carefully.
2. Generate ONLY a query string suitable for Elasticsearch's match query.
3. Focus on key terms and concepts from the question.
4. Include synonyms or related terms that might be in relevant documents.
5. Use simple Elasticsearch query string syntax if helpful (e.g., OR, AND).
6. Do not use advanced Elasticsearch features or syntax.
7. Do not include any explanations, comments, or additional text.
8. Provide only the query string, nothing else.
For the question "What is Clickthrough Data?", we would expect a response like:
clickthrough data OR click-through data OR click through rate OR CTR OR user clicks OR ad clicks OR search engine results OR web analytics
AND operator is not allowed. Use only OR.
User Question:
[The user's question will be inserted here]
Generate the Elasticsearch query string:
'''Bei Anwendung auf unsere Anfrage generiert GPT-4o Synonyme der Basisanfrage und verwandtes Vokabular.
'audits elastic OR
elasticsearch audits OR
elastic auditor OR
elasticsearch auditor OR
elastic audit firm OR
elastic audit company OR
elastic audit organization OR
elastic audit service'In der Klasse ESQueryMaker habe ich eine Funktion definiert, um die Abfrage aufzuteilen:
def parse_or_query(self, query_text: str) -> List[str]:
# Split the query by 'OR' and strip whitespace from each term
# This converts a string like "term1 OR term2 OR term3" into a list ["term1", "term2", "term3"]
return [term.strip() for term in query_text.split(' OR ')]Seine Aufgabe besteht darin, diese Kette von ODER-Klauseln in eine Liste von Begriffen aufzuteilen, um uns eine Mehrfachübereinstimmung unserer wichtigsten Dokumentfelder zu ermöglichen:
["original_text", 'keyphrases', 'potential_questions', 'entities']Schließlich komme ich zu folgender Anfrage:
'query': {
'bool': {
'must': [
{
'multi_match': {
'query': 'audits Elastic Elastic auditing Elastic audit process Elastic compliance Elastic security audit Elasticsearch auditing Elasticsearch compliance Elasticsearch security audit',
'fields': [
'original_text',
'keyphrases',
'potential_questions',
'entities'
],
'type': 'best_fields',
'operator': 'or'
}
}
]Dies deckt wesentlich mehr Aspekte ab als die ursprüngliche Anfrage und verringert hoffentlich das Risiko, ein Suchergebnis zu verpassen, weil wir ein Synonym vergessen haben. Aber wir können mehr tun.
HyDE (Hypothetische Dokumenteneinbettung)
Lassen Sie uns GPT-4o erneut einsetzen, diesmal zur Implementierung von HyDE.
Die Grundidee von HyDE besteht darin, ein hypothetisches Dokument zu generieren – also ein Dokument, das wahrscheinlich die Antwort auf die ursprüngliche Anfrage enthält. Die sachliche Richtigkeit oder Genauigkeit des Dokuments ist nicht von Belang. Vor diesem Hintergrund formulieren wir nun die folgende Aufgabenstellung:
HYDE_DOCUMENT_GENERATOR_PROMPT = '''
You are an AI assistant specialized in generating hypothetical documents based on user queries. Your task is to create a detailed, factual document that would likely contain the answer to the user's question. This hypothetical document will be used to enhance the retrieval process in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system.
Guidelines:
1. Carefully analyze the user's query to understand the topic and the type of information being sought.
2. Generate a hypothetical document that:
a. Is directly relevant to the query
b. Contains factual information that would answer the query
c. Includes additional context and related information
d. Uses a formal, informative tone similar to an encyclopedia or textbook entry
3. Structure the document with clear paragraphs, covering different aspects of the topic.
4. Include specific details, examples, or data points that would be relevant to the query.
5. Aim for a document length of 200-300 words.
6. Do not use citations or references, as this is a hypothetical document.
7. Avoid using phrases like "In this document" or "This text discusses" - write as if it's a real, standalone document.
8. Do not mention or refer to the original query in the generated document.
9. Ensure the content is factual and objective, avoiding opinions or speculative information.
10. Output only the generated document, without any additional explanations or meta-text.
User Question:
[The user's question will be inserted here]
Generate a hypothetical document that would likely contain the answer to this query:
'''Da die Vektorsuche typischerweise mit der Kosinusvektorähnlichkeit arbeitet, besteht die Prämisse von HyDE darin, dass wir bessere Ergebnisse erzielen können, indem wir Dokumente mit Dokumenten abgleichen, anstatt Anfragen mit Dokumenten abzugleichen.
Uns geht es um Struktur, Ablauf und Terminologie. Nicht so sehr die Fakten. GPT-4o erzeugt ein HyDE-Dokument wie dieses:
'Elastic N.V., the parent company of Elastic, the organization known for developing Elasticsearch, is subject to audits to ensure financial accuracy,
regulatory compliance, and the integrity of its financial statements. The auditing of Elastic N.V. is typically conducted by an external,
independent auditing firm. This is common practice for publicly traded companies to provide stakeholders with assurance regarding the company\'s
financial position and operations.\n\nThe primary external auditor for Elastic is the audit firm Ernst & Young LLP (EY). Ernst & Young is one of the
four largest professional services networks in the world, commonly referred to as the "Big Four" audit firms. These firms handle a substantial number
of audits for major corporations around the globe, ensuring adherence to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and international financial
reporting standards (IFRS).\n\nThe audit process conducted by EY involves several steps. Initially, the auditors perform a risk assessment to identify
areas where misstatements due to error or fraud could occur. They then design audit procedures to test the accuracy and completeness of financial statements,
which include examining financial transactions, assessing internal controls, and reviewing compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Upon completion of
the audit, Ernst & Young issues an audit report, which includes the auditor’s opinion on whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement
and are presented fairly in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.\n\nIn addition to external audits by firms like Ernst & Young,
Elastic may also be subject to internal audits. Internal audits are performed by the company’s own internal auditors to evaluate the effectiveness of internal
controls, risk management, and governance processes.\n\nOverall, the auditing process plays a crucial role in maintaining the transparency and reliability of
Elastic\'s financial information, providing confidence to investors, regulators, and other stakeholders.'Es sieht ziemlich glaubwürdig aus, wie der ideale Kandidat für die Art von Dokumenten, die wir indexieren möchten. Wir werden dies einbetten und für die hybride Suche verwenden.
Hybrid Search
Dies ist der Kern unserer Suchlogik. Unsere lexikalische Suchkomponente besteht aus den generierten OR-Klauselzeichenketten. Unsere dichte Vektorkomponente wird das eingebettete HyDE-Dokument (auch Suchvektor genannt) sein. Wir verwenden KNN, um effizient mehrere Kandidatendokumente zu identifizieren, die unserem Suchvektor am nächsten liegen. Unsere lexikalische Suchkomponente nennen wir standardmäßig Scoring mit TF-IDF und BM25 . Schließlich werden die lexikalischen und dichten Vektorwerte unter Verwendung des von Wang et al. empfohlenen Verhältnisses von 30/70 kombiniert.
def hybrid_vector_search(self, index_name: str, query_text: str, query_vector: List[float],
text_fields: List[str], vector_field: str,
num_candidates: int = 100, num_results: int = 10) -> Dict:
"""
Perform a hybrid search combining text-based and vector-based similarity.
Args:
index_name (str): The name of the Elasticsearch index to search.
query_text (str): The text query string, which may contain 'OR' separated terms.
query_vector (List[float]): The query vector for semantic similarity search.
text_fields (List[str]): List of text fields to search in the index.
vector_field (str): The name of the field containing document vectors.
num_candidates (int): Number of candidates to consider in the initial KNN search.
num_results (int): Number of final results to return.
Returns:
Dict: A tuple containing the Elasticsearch response and the search body used.
"""
try:
# Parse the query_text into a list of individual search terms
# This splits terms separated by 'OR' and removes any leading/trailing whitespace
query_terms = self.parse_or_query(query_text)
# Construct the search body for Elasticsearch
search_body = {
# KNN search component for vector similarity
"knn": {
"field": vector_field, # The field containing document vectors
"query_vector": query_vector, # The query vector to compare against
"k": num_candidates, # Number of nearest neighbors to retrieve
"num_candidates": num_candidates # Number of candidates to consider in the KNN search
},
"query": {
"bool": {
# The 'must' clause ensures that matching documents must satisfy this condition
# Documents that don't match this clause are excluded from the results
"must": [
{
# Multi-match query to search across multiple text fields
"multi_match": {
"query": " ".join(query_terms), # Join all query terms into a single space-separated string
"fields": text_fields, # List of fields to search in
"type": "best_fields", # Use the best matching field for scoring
"operator": "or" # Match any of the terms (equivalent to the original OR query)
}
}
],
# The 'should' clause boosts relevance but doesn't exclude documents
# It's used here to combine vector similarity with text relevance
"should": [
{
# Custom scoring using a script to combine vector and text scores
"script_score": {
"query": {"match_all": {}}, # Apply this scoring to all documents that matched the 'must' clause
"script": {
# Script to combine vector similarity and text relevance
"source": """
# Calculate vector similarity (cosine similarity + 1)
# Adding 1 ensures the score is always positive
double vector_score = cosineSimilarity(params.query_vector, params.vector_field) + 1.0;
# Get the text-based relevance score from the multi_match query
double text_score = _score;
# Combine scores: 70% vector similarity, 30% text relevance
# This weighting can be adjusted based on the importance of semantic vs keyword matching
return 0.7 * vector_score + 0.3 * text_score;
""",
# Parameters passed to the script
"params": {
"query_vector": query_vector, # Query vector for similarity calculation
"vector_field": vector_field # Field containing document vectors
}
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
# Execute the search request against the Elasticsearch index
response = self.conn.search(index=index_name, body=search_body, size=num_results)
# Log the successful execution of the search for monitoring and debugging
logger.info(f"Hybrid search executed on index: {index_name} with text query: {query_text}")
# Return both the response and the search body (useful for debugging and result analysis)
return response, search_body
except Exception as e:
# Log any errors that occur during the search process
logger.error(f"Error executing hybrid search on index: {index_name}. Error: {e}")
# Re-raise the exception for further handling in the calling code
raise eSchließlich können wir eine RAG-Funktion zusammensetzen. Unser Ampelsystem, von der Anfrage bis zur Antwort, folgt diesem Ablauf:
Konvertiere die Abfrage in OR-Klauseln.
Generieren Sie ein HyDE-Dokument und betten Sie es ein.
Übergeben Sie beide Werte als Eingaben an die Hybridsuche.
Die Top-n-Ergebnisse abrufen und umkehren, sodass die relevanteste Bewertung im Kontextspeicher des LLM als „aktuellste“ angezeigt wird (Reverse Packing). Beispiel für Reverse Packing: Anfrage: „Elasticsearch-Abfrageoptimierungstechniken“. Abgerufene Dokumente (sortiert nach Relevanz): Umgekehrte Reihenfolge für den LLM-Kontext: Durch die Umkehrung der Reihenfolge erscheint die relevanteste Information (1) zuletzt im Kontext und erhält potenziell mehr Aufmerksamkeit vom LLM bei der Antwortgenerierung.
„Verwenden Sie Boolesche Abfragen, um mehrere Suchkriterien effizient zu kombinieren.“
„Implementieren Sie Caching-Strategien, um die Antwortzeiten von Abfragen zu verbessern.“
„Indexzuordnungen für schnellere Suchleistung optimieren.“
„Indexzuordnungen für schnellere Suchleistung optimieren.“
„Implementieren Sie Caching-Strategien, um die Antwortzeiten von Abfragen zu verbessern.“
„Verwenden Sie Boolesche Abfragen, um mehrere Suchkriterien effizient zu kombinieren.“
Übergeben Sie den Kontext zur Generierung an das LLM.
def get_context(index_name,
match_query,
text_query,
fields,
num_candidates=100,
num_results=20,
text_fields=["original_text", 'keyphrases', 'potential_questions', 'entities'],
embedding_field="primary_embedding"):
embedding=embedder.get_embeddings_from_text(text_query)
results, search_body = es_query_maker.hybrid_vector_search(
index_name=index_name,
query_text=match_query,
query_vector=embedding[0][0],
text_fields=text_fields,
vector_field=embedding_field,
num_candidates=num_candidates,
num_results=num_results
)
# Concatenates the text in each 'field' key of the search result objects into a single block of text.
context_docs=['\n\n'.join([field+":\n\n"+j['_source'][field] for field in fields]) for j in results['hits']['hits']]
# Reverse Packing to ensure that the highest ranking document is seen first by the LLM.
context_docs.reverse()
return context_docs, search_body
def retrieval_augmented_generation(query_text):
match_query= gpt4o.generate_query(query_text)
fields=['original_text']
hyde_document=gpt4o.generate_HyDE(query_text)
context, search_body=get_context(index_name, match_query, hyde_document, fields)
answer= gpt4o.basic_qa(query=query_text, context=context)
return answer, match_query, hyde_document, context, search_bodyFühren wir unsere Abfrage aus und erhalten wir die Antwort:
According to the context, Elastic N.V. is audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).
This information is found in the section titled "report of independent registered public accounting firm," which states:
"We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Elastic N.V. [...] / s / pricewaterhouseco."Hübsch. Das ist richtig.
Experimente
Jetzt gilt es, eine wichtige Frage zu beantworten. Was hat uns der immense Aufwand und die zusätzliche Komplexität dieser Implementierungen gebracht?
Lasst uns einen kleinen Vergleich anstellen. Die von uns implementierte RAG-Pipeline im Vergleich zur hybriden Basissuche, ohne die von uns vorgenommenen Verbesserungen. Wir werden eine kleine Testreihe durchführen und sehen, ob wir wesentliche Unterschiede feststellen. Wir werden das soeben implementierte RAG-Schema als AdvancedRAG und die Basispipeline als SimpleRAG bezeichnen.
Einfache RAG-Pipeline ohne Schnickschnack
Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse
Diese Tabelle fasst die Ergebnisse von fünf Tests beider RAG-Pipelines zusammen. Ich habe die relative Überlegenheit der einzelnen Methoden anhand der Detailtiefe und Qualität der Antworten beurteilt, aber dies ist eine rein subjektive Einschätzung. Die tatsächlichen Antworten sind unterhalb dieser Tabelle zu Ihrer Information aufgeführt. Nach dieser Vorrede schauen wir uns nun an, wie sie abgeschnitten haben!
SimpleRAG konnte die Fragen 1 und 5 nicht beantworten. AdvancedRAG ging bei den Fragen 2, 3 und 4 wesentlich detaillierter vor. Aufgrund der detaillierteren Antworten beurteilte ich die Qualität der Antworten von AdvancedRAG als besser.
Prüfen | Frage | AdvancedRAG-Leistung | SimpleRAG Performance | Erweiterte RAG-Latenz | SimpleRAG-Latenz | Gewinner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Wer prüft Elastic? | PwC wurde korrekt als Wirtschaftsprüfer identifiziert. | Der Prüfer konnte nicht identifiziert werden. | 11,6 Sekunden | 4,4 Sekunden | AdvancedRAG |
2 | Wie hoch waren die Gesamteinnahmen im Jahr 2023? | Die korrekte Umsatzzahl wurde angegeben. Zusätzliche Kontextinformationen wurden mit Umsatzzahlen aus den Vorjahren hinzugefügt. | Die korrekte Umsatzzahl wurde angegeben. | 13,3 Sekunden | 2,8 Sekunden | AdvancedRAG |
3 | Von welchem Produkt hängt das Wachstum primär ab? Wie viel? | Elastic Cloud wurde korrekt als Haupttreiber identifiziert. Beinhaltete den Gesamtkontext der Einnahmen und detailliertere Informationen. | Elastic Cloud wurde korrekt als Haupttreiber identifiziert. | 14,1 Sekunden | 12,8 Sekunden | AdvancedRAG |
4 | Beschreibung des Mitarbeitervergütungsprogramms | Gab eine umfassende Beschreibung der Altersvorsorgepläne, Gesundheitsprogramme und sonstigen Leistungen. Enthält spezifische Beitragsbeträge für verschiedene Jahre. | Es wurde ein guter Überblick über die Leistungen gegeben, einschließlich Vergütung, Altersvorsorgepläne, Arbeitsumfeld und das Elastic Cares-Programm. | 26,6 Sekunden | 11,6 Sekunden | AdvancedRAG |
5 | Welche Unternehmen hat Elastic übernommen? | Die im Bericht erwähnten kürzlich erfolgten Akquisitionen (CmdWatch, Build Security, Optimyze) wurden korrekt aufgeführt. Es wurden einige Anschaffungsdaten und Kaufpreise angegeben. | Es konnten keine relevanten Informationen aus dem bereitgestellten Kontext abgerufen werden. | 11,9 Sekunden | 2,7 Sekunden | AdvancedRAG |
Test 1: Wer prüft Elastic?
AdvancedRAG
According to the context, Elastic N.V. is audited by an independent
registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).
This information is found in the section titled "report of
independent registered public accounting firm," which states:
"We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
of Elastic N.V. [...] / s / pricewaterhouseco."SimpleRAG
According to the provided context, no specific auditing firm
or company is mentioned as the auditor for Elastic.
The context provided talks about various features, strengths,
deployment options, and other details related to Elastic and
its operations but does not specify which auditing firm is
responsible for auditing Elastic's financial statements or
internal controls.Zusammenfassung: SimpleRAG hat PwC nicht als Wirtschaftsprüfer identifiziert.
Okay, das ist tatsächlich ziemlich überraschend. Das sieht nach einem Suchfehler seitens SimpleRAG aus. Es wurden keine Dokumente im Zusammenhang mit der Wirtschaftsprüfung gefunden. Lasst uns den Schwierigkeitsgrad beim nächsten Test etwas reduzieren.
Test 2: Gesamtumsatz 2023
AdvancedRAG
### Total Revenue for 2023
According to the provided context, the total revenue for the
year ended April 30, 2023, was **$1,068,989,000**. This
information can be found several times in the provided text.
Specifically, one part states:
"The following table sets forth our results of operations
for the periods presented in dollars and as a percentage of
our total revenue. ... year ended April 30, 2023, ...
total revenue 1,068,989".
Additionally, it is mentioned here as well:
"For the years ended April 30, 2023, 2022, and 2021,
representing year-over-year growth of 24% for the year
ended April 30, 2023... total revenue $1,068,989".
Therefore, the total revenue for 2023 is $1.069 billion.SimpleRAG
According to the context provided, the total revenue for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2023, is:
$1,068,989,000 (or approximately $1.1 billion).Zusammenfassung: Beide RAGs haben die richtige Antwort gegeben: 1.068.989.000 US-Dollar Gesamtumsatz im Jahr 2023
Beide waren genau hier. Es scheint, als ob AdvancedRAG ein breiteres Spektrum an Dokumenten erworben hat. Die Antwort ist sicherlich detaillierter und berücksichtigt auch Informationen aus den Vorjahren. Das war angesichts der von uns vorgenommenen Verbesserungen zu erwarten, aber es ist viel zu früh, um das zu beurteilen.
Erhöhen wir den Schwierigkeitsgrad.
Test 3: Von welchem Produkt hängt das Wachstum primär ab? Wie viel?
AdvancedRAG
### Product Growth Primarily Depends On:
According to the context, "our revenue is derived primarily from
subscriptions of search, observability and security built into
the elastic stack." The document mentions various strategies and
factors contributing to the company’s growth which include investment
in "elastic cloud," "elastic stack," and the conversion of free
users to paid subscribers.
### Quantitative Data:
- **Revenue**: The document states, "Our total revenue was $1.1 billion,
$862.4 million, and $608.5 million for the years ended April 30, 2023,
2022, and 2021, respectively."
- **Subscription Revenue**: "Subscriptions accounted for 92%, 93%,
and 93% of our total revenue for the years ended April 30, 2023,
2022, and 2021, respectively."
- **Elastic Cloud Contribution**: "For the years ended April 30, 2023,
2022, and 2021, Elastic Cloud contributed 40%, 35%, and 27% of our
total revenue, respectively."
- **Customer Growth**: The number of customers increased from
"over 15,000 as of April 30, 2021," to "approximately 20,200 as of
April 30, 2023."
### Summary:
Product growth for the company primarily depends on the "Elastic Stack"
(which includes search, observability, and security solutions) and
particularly the "Elastic Cloud." The Elastic Cloud's growing contribution
to revenue highlights its significance, which grew from 27% in 2021 to 40% in 2023.SimpleRAG
According to the provided context, growth primarily depends on **Elastic Cloud**,
which is described as the company's "family of cloud-based offerings."
The context also emphasizes the significance of Elastic Cloud in achieving
the company's long-term growth potential and its role in increasing subscription revenue.
From the context:
- "Increasing adoption of Elastic Cloud... is an important growth opportunity
for our business. Organizations are increasingly looking for hosted
deployment alternatives with reduced administrative burdens."
- "We believe that offering Elastic Cloud is important for achieving
our long-term growth potential, and we expect Elastic Cloud’s contribution
to our subscription revenue to continue to increase."
In terms of the contribution to total revenue, here are the specific figures provided:
- Elastic Cloud contributed 40% of the total revenue for the year ended April 30, 2023.
- Elastic Cloud contributed 35% of the total revenue for the year ended April 30, 2022.
- Elastic Cloud contributed 27% of the total revenue for the year ended April 30, 2021.
This progression shows a clear upward trend in the importance and
contribution of Elastic Cloud to the company's overall revenue.Zusammenfassung: Beide RAG-Modelle haben Elastic Cloud korrekt als wichtigsten Wachstumstreiber identifiziert. AdvancedRAG hingegen enthält mehr Details, berücksichtigt Abonnementumsätze und Kundenwachstum und erwähnt explizit andere Elastic-Angebote.
Test 4: Beschreiben Sie den Mitarbeitervergütungsplan
AdvancedRAG
### Employee Benefit Plan Overview
The provided context outlines various elements of the employee benefit plan at
Elastic, often referred to as "Elasticians." Here are the key components
described in the texts:
1. **401(k) Plan**:
- **Coverage**: The 401(k) plan is available to substantially all U.S.
employees who meet minimum age and service requirements.
- **Contributions**: Elastic makes contributions to the 401(k) plan up to
6% of the participating employee’s W-2 earnings and wages.
- **Expenses**: For the fiscal years ended April 30, Elastic recorded
expenses of $17.9 million (2023), $15.2 million (2022), and $11.4 million (2021)
related to the 401(k) plan.
- **Defined-Contribution Plans in Other Countries**: Elastic has
defined-contribution plans in various other countries and recorded respective
expenses of $9.4 million (2023), $7.2 million (2022), and $5.1 million (2021).
2. **Stock-Based Compensation**:
- **Types of Awards**: Stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs),
and shares under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP).
- **Fair Value Measurement**: Fair value of these stock awards is
measured using models like Black-Scholes.
- **Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2022 ESPP)**:
- Started in 2022, it allows employees to acquire ordinary
shares at a discount (85% of the market value at the beginning
or end of the offering period).
- Offering periods are approximately six months long.
3. **Total Rewards Compensation**:
- **Components**: Includes cash compensation as well as equity awards,
reflecting a comprehensive interest in the well-being of the employees.
- **Programs**: Market competitive medical and dental programs,
mental health, and holistic well-being programs.
- **Paid Time Off**: Features 16 weeks of paid leave for new
parents and life-planning benefits.
4. **Retirement and Income Protection Plans**:
- **401(k) Match**: Elastic provides a dollar-for-dollar
match up to 6% of eligible earnings up to a plan-limit
maximum for U.S.-based employees.
- **Similar Plans Outside the U.S.**: Competitive retirement
plans available for employees based outside the United States.
5. **Flexible Work Environment**:
- **Distributed Workforce**: Elastic operates with a global
distributed workforce model, allowing employees to work remotely
and providing a broad candidate pool.
6. **Learning and Development**:
- **Programs**: Access to on-demand video-based learning,
leadership development programs, and other specific training
to develop managers and leaders.
7. **Employee Engagement and Surveys**:
- **Mechanisms**: Annual employee engagement survey and
mid-year pulse survey.
- **Objectives**: To monitor morale, develop action plans,
and maintain high engagement scores.
8. **Onboarding Program**:
- **X-School**: An extensive new-hire orientation program to
help new employees meet peers and learn about the company's
products and solutions.
In summary, Elastic's employee benefit plan encompasses a broad
spectrum of financial, health, well-being, and professional development
benefits designed to support and enhance the lives of its employees.
The plan is both competitive and comprehensive, aiming to attract,
retain, and engage its global workforce.SimpleRAG
The employee benefit plan at the Company includes several key
components aimed at enhancing the overall well-being and
professional development of employees, referred to as "Elasticians."
1. **Compensation and Benefits:**
- The Company provides market-competitive compensation
packages which typically include cash compensation and equity awards.
- Comprehensive medical and dental programs are offered,
emphasizing mental health and holistic well-being.
- Paid time off programs feature:
- 16 weeks of paid leave for new parents.
- Life-planning benefits.
- Travel reimbursements for certain healthcare services.
2. **Retirement and Income Protection Plans:**
- In the United States, employees are eligible for a 401k
plan with a dollar-for-dollar match by the Company up to 6%
of eligible earnings, subject to a plan limit.
- Similar competitive retirement and income protection plans
are available for employees outside the United States.
3. **Work Environment:**
- The Company offers a flexible work environment, allowing most
employees to work from anywhere as often as they would like.
- Physical offices around the world are available for employees
who prefer to work on-site or need a space for face-to-face interactions.
4. **Community Involvement:**
- The Elastic Cares Program supports charitable organizations
that matter to employees on both local and global levels.
- The program includes:
- Donation matching.
- Providing the Company's technology for free to certain
nonprofit organizations.
- Volunteer time off initiative.Zusammenfassung: AdvancedRAG geht wesentlich tiefer und detaillierter darauf ein und erwähnt den 401K-Plan für in den USA ansässige Mitarbeiter sowie die Beitragspläne außerhalb der USA. Es werden auch Gesundheits- und Wohlbefindenspläne erwähnt, das Programm Elastic Cares, das SimpleRAG erwähnt, wird jedoch nicht aufgeführt.
Test 5: Welche Unternehmen hat Elastic übernommen?
AdvancedRAG
Elastic acquired several companies over the years to enhance its
technology and market presence. According to the provided context,
the specific acquisitions include:
1. **CmdWatch Security Inc.**: Acquired on September 17, 2021.
The total purchase consideration was $77.8 million.
2. **Build Security Ltd.**: Acquired on September 2, 2021. The
combined purchase price for Build Security Ltd. and another acquisition was $57.2 million.
3. **Optimyze Cloud Inc.**: Acquired on November 1, 2021. Part
of the combined purchase price mentioned above with Build Security Ltd.
4. **Endgame, Inc.**: Although the context mentions an amended
and restated stock incentive plan, it indicates that Endgame, Inc. was
associated with Elastic, suggesting it could have been acquired at some point.
These acquisitions are part of Elastic's strategy to
enhance the technology underlying its security and
observability offerings.SimpleRAG
The provided context does not specify any companies that Elastic has acquired.
Therefore, based on the context, there is no information available about the companies acquired by Elastic.Zusammenfassung: SimpleRAG liefert keine relevanten Informationen zu Akquisitionen, was zu einer fehlerhaften Antwort führt. AdvancedRAG listet CmdWatch, Build Security und Optimyze korrekt auf; dies waren die im Bericht genannten wichtigsten Akquisitionen.
Fazit
Unsere Tests ergaben, dass unsere fortschrittlichen Techniken den Umfang und die Tiefe der präsentierten Informationen erhöhen und dadurch potenziell die Qualität der RAG-Antworten verbessern.
Darüber hinaus könnten Verbesserungen bei der Zuverlässigkeit erzielt werden, da mehrdeutig formulierte Fragen wie Which companies did Elastic acquire? und Who audits Elastic von AdvancedRAG korrekt beantwortet wurden, nicht aber von SimpleRAG.
Allerdings sollte man bedenken, dass in 3 von 5 Fällen die grundlegende RAG-Pipeline, die die Hybridsuche, aber keine anderen Techniken einbezog, Antworten lieferte, die den Großteil der wichtigsten Informationen erfassten.
Es ist zu beachten, dass die Latenz von AdvancedRAG aufgrund der Einbeziehung von LLMs in den Phasen der Datenaufbereitung und -abfrage im Allgemeinen 2- bis 5-mal größer ist als die von SimpleRAG. Dies stellt einen erheblichen Kostenfaktor dar, der AdvancedRAG möglicherweise nur für Situationen geeignet macht, in denen die Antwortqualität Vorrang vor der Latenz hat.
Die erheblichen Latenzkosten können durch den Einsatz eines kleineren und kostengünstigeren LLM wie Claude Haiku oder GPT-4o-mini in der Datenaufbereitungsphase verringert werden. Die fortgeschrittenen Modelle werden für die Antwortgenerierung verwendet.
Dies steht im Einklang mit den Ergebnissen von Wang et al. Wie ihre Ergebnisse zeigen, sind alle erzielten Verbesserungen relativ geringfügig. Kurz gesagt, mit einer einfachen RAG-Basislinie kommt man schon fast zu einem brauchbaren Endprodukt und ist dabei auch noch günstiger und schneller. Für mich ist das ein interessantes Ergebnis. Für Anwendungsfälle, in denen Geschwindigkeit und Effizienz im Vordergrund stehen, ist SimpleRAG die vernünftige Wahl. Für Anwendungsfälle, in denen jedes letzte Quäntchen Leistung herausgeholt werden muss, könnten die in AdvancedRAG integrierten Techniken einen vielversprechenden Ansatz bieten.
Die Ergebnisse der Studie von Wang et al. zeigen, dass der Einsatz fortschrittlicher Techniken zwar stetige, aber nur schrittweise Verbesserungen bewirkt.
Anhang
Eingabeaufforderungen
RAG-Frage-Antwort-Aufforderung
Aufforderung an das LLM, Antworten basierend auf Anfrage und Kontext zu generieren.
BASIC_RAG_PROMPT = '''
You are an AI assistant tasked with answering questions based primarily on the provided context, while also drawing on your own knowledge when appropriate. Your role is to accurately and comprehensively respond to queries, prioritizing the information given in the context but supplementing it with your own understanding when beneficial. Follow these guidelines:
1. Carefully read and analyze the entire context provided.
2. Primarily focus on the information present in the context to formulate your answer.
3. If the context doesn't contain sufficient information to fully answer the query, state this clearly and then supplement with your own knowledge if possible.
4. Use your own knowledge to provide additional context, explanations, or examples that enhance the answer.
5. Clearly distinguish between information from the provided context and your own knowledge. Use phrases like "According to the context..." or "The provided information states..." for context-based information, and "Based on my knowledge..." or "Drawing from my understanding..." for your own knowledge.
6. Provide comprehensive answers that address the query specifically, balancing conciseness with thoroughness.
7. When using information from the context, cite or quote relevant parts using quotation marks.
8. Maintain objectivity and clearly identify any opinions or interpretations as such.
9. If the context contains conflicting information, acknowledge this and use your knowledge to provide clarity if possible.
10. Make reasonable inferences based on the context and your knowledge, but clearly identify these as inferences.
11. If asked about the source of information, distinguish between the provided context and your own knowledge base.
12. If the query is ambiguous, ask for clarification before attempting to answer.
13. Use your judgment to determine when additional information from your knowledge base would be helpful or necessary to provide a complete and accurate answer.
Remember, your goal is to provide accurate, context-based responses, supplemented by your own knowledge when it adds value to the answer. Always prioritize the provided context, but don't hesitate to enhance it with your broader understanding when appropriate. Clearly differentiate between the two sources of information in your response.
Context:
[The concatenated documents will be inserted here]
Query:
[The user's question will be inserted here]
Please provide your answer based on the above guidelines, the given context, and your own knowledge where appropriate, clearly distinguishing between the two:
'''Eingabeaufforderung für den Elastic-Abfragegenerator
Aufforderung zur Anreicherung von Abfragen mit Synonymen und deren Umwandlung in das OR-Format.
ELASTIC_SEARCH_QUERY_GENERATOR_PROMPT = '''
You are an AI assistant specialized in generating Elasticsearch query strings. Your task is to create the most effective query string for the given user question. This query string will be used to search for relevant documents in an Elasticsearch index.
Guidelines:
1. Analyze the user's question carefully.
2. Generate ONLY a query string suitable for Elasticsearch's match query.
3. Focus on key terms and concepts from the question.
4. Include synonyms or related terms that might be in relevant documents.
5. Use simple Elasticsearch query string syntax if helpful (e.g., OR, AND).
6. Do not use advanced Elasticsearch features or syntax.
7. Do not include any explanations, comments, or additional text.
8. Provide only the query string, nothing else.
For the question "What is Clickthrough Data?", we would expect a response like:
clickthrough data OR click-through data OR click through rate OR CTR OR user clicks OR ad clicks OR search engine results OR web analytics
AND operator is not allowed. Use only OR.
User Question:
[The user's question will be inserted here]
Generate the Elasticsearch query string:
'''Mögliche Fragen zur Generierung von Anregungen
Anregung zur Generierung potenzieller Fragen, Anreicherung der Dokumentmetadaten.
RAG_QUESTION_GENERATOR_PROMPT = '''
You are an AI assistant specialized in generating questions for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Your task is to analyze a given document and create 10 diverse questions that would effectively test a RAG system's ability to retrieve and synthesize information from this document.
Guidelines:
1. Thoroughly analyze the entire document.
2. Generate exactly 10 questions that cover various aspects and levels of complexity within the document's content.
3. Create questions that specifically target:
a. Key facts and information
b. Main concepts and ideas
c. Relationships between different parts of the content
d. Potential applications or implications of the information
e. Comparisons or contrasts within the document
4. Ensure questions require answers of varying lengths and complexity, from simple retrieval to more complex synthesis.
5. Include questions that might require combining information from different parts of the document.
6. Frame questions to test both literal comprehension and inferential understanding.
7. Avoid yes/no questions; focus on open-ended questions that promote comprehensive answers.
8. Consider including questions that might require additional context or knowledge to fully answer, to test the RAG system's ability to combine retrieved information with broader knowledge.
9. Number the questions from 1 to 10.
10. Output only the ten questions, without any additional text, explanations, or answers.
Document:
[The document content will be inserted here]
Generate 10 questions optimized for testing a RAG system based on this document:
'''HyDE-Generator-Eingabeaufforderung
Aufforderung zur Generierung hypothetischer Dokumente mit HyDE
HYDE_DOCUMENT_GENERATOR_PROMPT = '''
You are an AI assistant specialized in generating hypothetical documents based on user queries. Your task is to create a detailed, factual document that would likely contain the answer to the user's question. This hypothetical document will be used to enhance the retrieval process in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system.
Guidelines:
1. Carefully analyze the user's query to understand the topic and the type of information being sought.
2. Generate a hypothetical document that:
a. Is directly relevant to the query
b. Contains factual information that would answer the query
c. Includes additional context and related information
d. Uses a formal, informative tone similar to an encyclopedia or textbook entry
3. Structure the document with clear paragraphs, covering different aspects of the topic.
4. Include specific details, examples, or data points that would be relevant to the query.
5. Aim for a document length of 200-300 words.
6. Do not use citations or references, as this is a hypothetical document.
7. Avoid using phrases like "In this document" or "This text discusses" - write as if it's a real, standalone document.
8. Do not mention or refer to the original query in the generated document.
9. Ensure the content is factual and objective, avoiding opinions or speculative information.
10. Output only the generated document, without any additional explanations or meta-text.
User Question:
[The user's question will be inserted here]
Generate a hypothetical document that would likely contain the answer to this query:
'''Beispiel einer hybriden Suchanfrage
{'knn': {'field': 'primary_embedding',
'query_vector': [0.4265527129173279,
-0.1712949573993683,
-0.042020395398139954,
...],
'k': 100,
'num_candidates': 100},
'query': {'bool': {'must': [{'multi_match': {'query': 'audits Elastic Elastic auditing Elastic audit process Elastic compliance Elastic security audit Elasticsearch auditing Elasticsearch compliance Elasticsearch security audit',
'fields': ['original_text',
'keyphrases',
'potential_questions',
'entities'],
'type': 'best_fields',
'operator': 'or'}}],
'should': [{'script_score': {'query': {'match_all': {}},
'script': {'source': '\n double vector_score = cosineSimilarity(params.query_vector, params.vector_field) + 1.0;\n double text_score = _score;\n return 0.7 * vector_score + 0.3 * text_score;\n ',
'params': {'query_vector': [0.4265527129173279,
-0.1712949573993683,
-0.042020395398139954,
...],
'vector_field': 'primary_embedding'}}}}]}},
'size': 10}
