Cumulative cardinality aggregationedit

A parent pipeline aggregation which calculates the Cumulative Cardinality in a parent histogram (or date_histogram) aggregation. The specified metric must be a cardinality aggregation and the enclosing histogram must have min_doc_count set to 0 (default for histogram aggregations).

The cumulative_cardinality agg is useful for finding "total new items", like the number of new visitors to your website each day. A regular cardinality aggregation will tell you how many unique visitors came each day, but doesn’t differentiate between "new" or "repeat" visitors. The Cumulative Cardinality aggregation can be used to determine how many of each day’s unique visitors are "new".

Syntaxedit

A cumulative_cardinality aggregation looks like this in isolation:

{
  "cumulative_cardinality": {
    "buckets_path": "my_cardinality_agg"
  }
}

Table 49. cumulative_cardinality Parameters

Parameter Name Description Required Default Value

buckets_path

The path to the cardinality aggregation we wish to find the cumulative cardinality for (see buckets_path Syntax for more details)

Required

format

format to apply to the output value of this aggregation

Optional

null

The following snippet calculates the cumulative cardinality of the total daily users:

GET /user_hits/_search
{
  "size": 0,
  "aggs": {
    "users_per_day": {
      "date_histogram": {
        "field": "timestamp",
        "calendar_interval": "day"
      },
      "aggs": {
        "distinct_users": {
          "cardinality": {
            "field": "user_id"
          }
        },
        "total_new_users": {
          "cumulative_cardinality": {
            "buckets_path": "distinct_users" 
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

buckets_path instructs this aggregation to use the output of the distinct_users aggregation for the cumulative cardinality

And the following may be the response:

{
   "took": 11,
   "timed_out": false,
   "_shards": ...,
   "hits": ...,
   "aggregations": {
      "users_per_day": {
         "buckets": [
            {
               "key_as_string": "2019-01-01T00:00:00.000Z",
               "key": 1546300800000,
               "doc_count": 2,
               "distinct_users": {
                  "value": 2
               },
               "total_new_users": {
                  "value": 2
               }
            },
            {
               "key_as_string": "2019-01-02T00:00:00.000Z",
               "key": 1546387200000,
               "doc_count": 2,
               "distinct_users": {
                  "value": 2
               },
               "total_new_users": {
                  "value": 3
               }
            },
            {
               "key_as_string": "2019-01-03T00:00:00.000Z",
               "key": 1546473600000,
               "doc_count": 3,
               "distinct_users": {
                  "value": 3
               },
               "total_new_users": {
                  "value": 4
               }
            }
         ]
      }
   }
}

Note how the second day, 2019-01-02, has two distinct users but the total_new_users metric generated by the cumulative pipeline agg only increments to three. This means that only one of the two users that day were new, the other had already been seen in the previous day. This happens again on the third day, where only one of three users is completely new.

Incremental cumulative cardinalityedit

The cumulative_cardinality agg will show you the total, distinct count since the beginning of the time period being queried. Sometimes, however, it is useful to see the "incremental" count. Meaning, how many new users are added each day, rather than the total cumulative count.

This can be accomplished by adding a derivative aggregation to our query:

GET /user_hits/_search
{
  "size": 0,
  "aggs": {
    "users_per_day": {
      "date_histogram": {
        "field": "timestamp",
        "calendar_interval": "day"
      },
      "aggs": {
        "distinct_users": {
          "cardinality": {
            "field": "user_id"
          }
        },
        "total_new_users": {
          "cumulative_cardinality": {
            "buckets_path": "distinct_users"
          }
        },
        "incremental_new_users": {
          "derivative": {
            "buckets_path": "total_new_users"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

And the following may be the response:

{
   "took": 11,
   "timed_out": false,
   "_shards": ...,
   "hits": ...,
   "aggregations": {
      "users_per_day": {
         "buckets": [
            {
               "key_as_string": "2019-01-01T00:00:00.000Z",
               "key": 1546300800000,
               "doc_count": 2,
               "distinct_users": {
                  "value": 2
               },
               "total_new_users": {
                  "value": 2
               }
            },
            {
               "key_as_string": "2019-01-02T00:00:00.000Z",
               "key": 1546387200000,
               "doc_count": 2,
               "distinct_users": {
                  "value": 2
               },
               "total_new_users": {
                  "value": 3
               },
               "incremental_new_users": {
                  "value": 1.0
               }
            },
            {
               "key_as_string": "2019-01-03T00:00:00.000Z",
               "key": 1546473600000,
               "doc_count": 3,
               "distinct_users": {
                  "value": 3
               },
               "total_new_users": {
                  "value": 4
               },
               "incremental_new_users": {
                  "value": 1.0
               }
            }
         ]
      }
   }
}